Our Take: Canon 85mm F1.4 L VCM
Canon's recent foray into prime L-Series lenses equipped with VCM autofocusing motors presents a compelling proposition for photographers seeking a harmonious blend of performance and portability. These new VCM lenses are distinguished by their notably compact dimensions, lightweight construction, and impressive fast apertures, all complemented by remarkably swift autofocus capabilities. The Canon RF 85mm F1.4 L VCM lens, the subject of our recent exploration, largely embodies this promise, delivering a commendable balance between its physical footprint and the exceptional image quality expected from Canon's esteemed L-Series. It invites creators to capture moments with a fluidity and grace that elevates the photographic experience.
However, a significant and pervasive issue shadows this otherwise impressive lineup, casting a considerable doubt on its broad recommendation. Across all these new VCM lenses, a singular, glaring oversight has been identified, one that is difficult to reconcile with the brand's commitment to its discerning clientele. In candid discussions with The Phoblographer's Editor in Chief, Chris Gampat, a consensus emerged that points to a perplexing design choice, leading to the unfortunate conclusion that Canon may be demonstrating a surprising disregard for the very individuals who invest in their artistry and innovation. This disconnect between potential and practicality is a crucial point of consideration for any creator aspiring to a refined and seamless workflow.
While the technical prowess and aesthetic appeal of the Canon RF 85mm F1.4 L VCM lens are undeniable, promising an immersive photographic journey filled with vibrant detail and aspirational results, the persistent challenge requires careful evaluation. The pursuit of a sophisticated and authentic creative practice often hinges on the reliability and user-centric design of the tools we employ. This lens, and its VCM counterparts, offer a tantalizing glimpse into a future of compact, high-performance optics, yet the identified flaw necessitates a nuanced perspective, encouraging creators to weigh the exceptional against the fundamentally inconvenient before fully embracing this evolving technology.