Event photography vs AI: do you feel insulated?
Our take
As the landscape of photography evolves, the dialogue surrounding the intersection of traditional practices and generative AI continues to spark intrigue and concern. A recent discussion initiated by a software developer venturing into event photography raises pertinent questions about the role of genuine human experience in capturing life's moments. This sentiment resonates deeply, particularly for those of us who find beauty and authenticity in the art of storytelling through images. The value of event photography lies in its ability to encapsulate real emotions and interactions—elements that generative AI, no matter how sophisticated, struggles to replicate. As explored in articles like Do you think more "natural" editing will be in demand due to the influx of AI? and Event photography etiquette, the essence of photography transcends mere aesthetics; it is about capturing fleeting moments that tell a story.
For event, wedding, and theatre photographers, the rise of generative AI poses both challenges and opportunities. While some may view AI as a threat, it is crucial to consider how this technology can coexist with traditional photography. The unique ability of photographers to engage with their subjects, anticipate moments, and respond to the unfolding narrative is irreplaceable. AI may generate images that appear visually appealing, but it cannot replace the intuition and emotional intelligence that come from years of honing one's craft in the field. Many photographers are likely to find that their artistry is more valued in a world where AI can create images at scale, prompting clients to seek authenticity and human connection in their visual content.
Interestingly, the conversation around AI in photography may also reflect broader societal shifts in how we perceive and value creativity. Are clients becoming more discerning about the origins of the images they cherish? The increasing popularity of discussions like Photography AI tools! hints at a growing awareness among consumers about the implications of AI-generated content. As the demand for authenticity rises, there may be a renewed appreciation for the skill and artistry that goes into capturing genuine moments, creating an environment where event photographers can thrive.
Looking ahead, the question remains: how will the relationship between event photographers and generative AI evolve? Will we see a shift in client expectations, with an emphasis on the authenticity that only a human touch can provide? As photographers navigate this new terrain, they must remain agile and innovative, embracing the opportunities that technology presents while staying true to their artistic vision. Ultimately, the ability to tell stories through images will continue to hold significant value, reminding us that while tools may change, the heart of photography remains rooted in human experience. As we explore this dynamic landscape, it will be essential to watch how both creators and consumers adapt to these changes, shaping the future of photography in the process.
I'm a software dev getting more serious about event photography on the side. I even have a hopefully regular paying client. Generative AI can obviously fake a convincing photo, but for events the value is capturing real moments. That feels harder to displace than, say, stock or product photography.
Do working event/wedding/theatre photographers feel the same? Has the rise of GenAI actually changed anything for you? Are clients asking about it, or is this a non-topic?
Feel free to add your thoughts if you come from another area of photography!
[link] [comments]
Read on the original site
Open the publisher's page for the full experience
Related Articles
- Do you think more "natural" editing will be in demand due to the influx of AI?Recently saw some professional photos someone had posted and I know they didn't use AI to process the faces, but the faces gave the same kind of vibes as AI. I also see similarities when the photo has the saturation dialed up or things just look too smooth. I had the thought that if I was paying for someone to take photos of my family, I would not be happy with them looking like that, even though I know that it's a stylistic thing and the photos would be considered good in most groups. Has anyone experienced clients asking for less processing or seen people taking more of their own photos and relying less on professional photography services due to AI? submitted by /u/x_Caffeine_Kitten_x [link] [comments]
- Photography AI tools!Everyone, I am in wedding and fashion/model photography industry. I am looking at automating a few segments of the processing sessions (mainly for Wedding, since for fashion we need to work on the nuances). Has anyone come across any tools that helps in Culling the images Auto Face recognition Tagging the image based on events Auto apply edits (can be done in Adobe Lightroom, but still wanted to setup a workflow) [yes, human touch js required and the edits will be supervised] Auto upload into any cloud storage (whichever is good) A few months back I heard many AI apps weren't up to the mark and still required a lot of human work. Is that the case even today? I went through the apps mentioned in the FAQ, and I couldn't find a workflow setup. NOTE: I use Sony A7 III body, Adobe Lightroom of light corrections, and Google Drive for storage. submitted by /u/AltruistWatson [link] [comments]
- Event photography etiquetteHi everyone, I've been doing photography for over a decade but event photo only about one year. When I'm shooting a smaller event 20-40ppl with flash, I can sense my presence is not always welcome, I understand that a flash can be annoying when you're just trying to chat /drink /eat. I struggle with small events because on one hand I want the client to feel like I'm working and I'm worth their money but I don't want to annoy all the guests by constantly photographing them. I can see them get self conscious. Sometimes I back off, stand by the side or hide somewhere to give them some peace, but I don't want the client to feel like I'm not there to catch the moment. How do yall more experienced event photographers deal or feel about this? submitted by /u/tryingandwondering [link] [comments]
- Computational photography pressure - When phone photos look “better”How do you deal with client expectations shaped by computational photography? I recently photographed an event where the lighting was challenging. There was a wide dynamic range, mixed and uneven light, and not many moments where the scene looked effortlessly polished. I brought along both my Nikon Z9 and Zf, but most of the shots ended up being taken with the Z9. I was still able to deliver a set of technically solid, well-lit photos. I edited them with selective masking and local adjustments, but I kept the overall look fairly realistic and true to the actual conditions. When I shared the gallery, I got the impression that the organizer was hoping for something a bit more “spectacular.” I noticed that some attendees had taken smartphone photos, and it seemed like she reacted more positively to those. The phone images had that appealing look: faces were evenly lit, with controlled, punchy contrast, giving off a sort of instant ‘cinematic’ feel, and the lighting appeared flawless I found that surprisingly difficult to deal with. Maybe part of it is my own skill level, and I’m open to that. But I also feel that computational photography has changed what non-photographers expect from images, especially in difficult lighting. Phones often produce an immediately pleasing version of reality, while professional cameras give us a more honest file that still requires judgement and restraint. For those of you shooting events professionally: do you feel pressure to match the “perfect” computational look of smartphone photos? How do you handle clients who seem to prefer that kind of processing? submitted by /u/meisjemeisje_1421 [link] [comments]