1 min readfrom Photography

How do you define "professional" photographer?

Our take

Defining a "professional" photographer often sparks debate within the creative community. While traditional views equate professionalism with earning income from photography, the essence of being a professional extends beyond financial compensation. It encompasses a commitment to quality, mastery of technique, and a deep understanding of elements like composition and lighting. Many passionate photographers, even without paid work, exhibit a level of skill that rivals or surpasses those who are commercially established. How do you perceive the distinction between professional, amateur, and hobbyist photographers?

I'm just curious how everyone defines "professional photographer?" Or amateur photographer. Or Hobby photographer. Etc. I've been asked before and wasn't sure what to say. I don't get paid for the photos I take. However, I do take the quality and things like composition and lighting very seriously. I also consider myself much better than amateur. If I say its a hobby, ironically that turns off most people. Makes it hard to get clients and taken seriously. Does paying someone somehow make them a professional? Let me know what you all think! Looking for advice.

submitted by /u/Studio_Noctis
[link] [comments]

Read on the original site

Open the publisher's page for the full experience

View original article

Tagged with

#health and wellness#luxury photography#fashion photography#wellness photography#professional photographer#amateur photographer#hobby photographer#photography#quality#composition#lighting#clients#paid#definition#seriously#curious#advice#better than amateur#turns off#professionalism