1 min readfrom Photography

I thought if you wanted to start a business, you should start out shooting for free?

Our take

In the world of photography, the debate over shooting for free is often contentious. A recent post highlighted a photographer who offered their services without charge for an event, sparking a flurry of comments questioning the wisdom of this approach. As a budding photographer, the idea of shooting for free to gain exposure and build a portfolio can seem appealing. However, it's essential to consider the value of your work and the potential implications of offering services without compensation.

Saw a post about someone who was shooting an event for free, but a ton of the comments were talking about why you would shoot for free. I thought, as a beginning photographer, you should shoot as much as you can to get your name out there, which includes shooting free, is this wrong?

submitted by /u/DaDancingDino
[link] [comments]

Read on the original site

Open the publisher's page for the full experience

View original article

Tagged with

#luxury photography#fashion photography#wellness photography#free#photographer#photography#shooting#business#event#portfolio#skill development#beginning#self-promotion#market presence#comments#networking#exposure#client acquisition#artistic growth#name recognition