Manual vs Local AI Editing Software? What's your opinions/recommendations?
Our take
The conversation surrounding AI editing software, particularly in the context of manual versus localized solutions, resonates deeply within the creative community. As photographers and artists evolve, so too do their tools and methods. The inquiry posed by a user, who has stepped away from Adobe CC in search of alternatives, reflects a broader sentiment that many creatives share. Concerns about the implications of cloud-based AI editing—often dismissed as "generative AI slop"—spark a critical dialogue about the future of photography and the authenticity of artistic expression. For those interested in navigating this landscape, the question remains: can localized AI tools offer a viable middle ground that respects artistic integrity while embracing technological advancement?
The skepticism toward major cloud-based AI services is not unfounded. Many artists feel that by using these platforms, they inadvertently contribute to an ecosystem that commodifies creativity and undermines the individual artist's voice. The notion that even localized AI editing could be seen as a form of complicity in the broader AI boom raises valid concerns. This mirrors the historical tensions between film purists and the digital revolution, where traditionalists feared that the integrity of their craft was being diluted by new technologies. As discussed in related articles like At what point does iPhone photography beat typical DSLR/mirrorless photography?, these debates are deeply rooted in the evolution of artistic mediums and the quest for authenticity.
However, the emergence of localized AI editing software presents an opportunity for photographers to maintain a degree of control over their work without succumbing to the overwhelming influence of large corporations. These tools often promise a more user-friendly interface and the capability to enhance images without relinquishing ownership or feeding into a data-hungry machine. As our community seeks solutions that align with both artistic sensibilities and practical needs, the demand for software that provides a balance of technology and artistry is more pertinent than ever. The challenge lies in finding platforms that respect the individuality of the artist while offering the efficiencies that AI can provide.
As we contemplate the future of photography in this rapidly evolving landscape, it’s essential to consider how these technological advancements will shape not only our creative processes but also the very essence of artistic expression. Will localized AI editing software become a trusted ally for artists seeking to enhance their work without compromising their values? Or will it fall into the same pitfalls that traditionalists fear? The outcome may very well depend on our collective willingness to engage with these tools thoughtfully and critically. As we move forward, the dialogue surrounding the balance between innovation and authenticity will continue to be crucial. The question remains: in a world increasingly driven by technology, how can we ensure that the artist remains at the heart of their work?
In this evolving narrative, it is essential for the artistic community to remain vigilant and discerning. Engaging with tools that align with one's values and aesthetic vision is paramount. As we navigate these changes, we must continually ask ourselves how our choices reflect our commitment to authenticity and creativity, ensuring that the future of photography remains vibrant and genuine.
I took a break from photography and was previously an Adobe CC user. I don't want to give money to Adobe anymore and I'd like to get accustomed to new software using older photos before I start shooting again.
Like myself, If you're someone who is against the AI boom w/ data centers and generative AI slop (won't be debating this), how do you view localized AI editing software? I've seen the argument that even if you're not paying for cloud AI, you're still giving the companies money to invest in it. Valid.
Is there a healthy middle ground between the two types of editing software? Is local AI software seen as ruining photography in the way film purists hate(d) digital photography?
I just want something decent with a good UI that won't feed my images to the AI slop machine. I mainly do portrait photography but want to work on a non-portrait project as well.
[link] [comments]
Read on the original site
Open the publisher's page for the full experience
Related Articles
- Do you think more "natural" editing will be in demand due to the influx of AI?Recently saw some professional photos someone had posted and I know they didn't use AI to process the faces, but the faces gave the same kind of vibes as AI. I also see similarities when the photo has the saturation dialed up or things just look too smooth. I had the thought that if I was paying for someone to take photos of my family, I would not be happy with them looking like that, even though I know that it's a stylistic thing and the photos would be considered good in most groups. Has anyone experienced clients asking for less processing or seen people taking more of their own photos and relying less on professional photography services due to AI? submitted by /u/x_Caffeine_Kitten_x [link] [comments]
- Photography AI tools!Everyone, I am in wedding and fashion/model photography industry. I am looking at automating a few segments of the processing sessions (mainly for Wedding, since for fashion we need to work on the nuances). Has anyone come across any tools that helps in Culling the images Auto Face recognition Tagging the image based on events Auto apply edits (can be done in Adobe Lightroom, but still wanted to setup a workflow) [yes, human touch js required and the edits will be supervised] Auto upload into any cloud storage (whichever is good) A few months back I heard many AI apps weren't up to the mark and still required a lot of human work. Is that the case even today? I went through the apps mentioned in the FAQ, and I couldn't find a workflow setup. NOTE: I use Sony A7 III body, Adobe Lightroom of light corrections, and Google Drive for storage. submitted by /u/AltruistWatson [link] [comments]
- Thoughts about ai clean up toolshi all, I am new to photography editing, and have been learning on my own using lightroom and a VERY small amount of photoshop to make my photos look better. recently, I needed to remove a shadow from an image, and I was presented with two option, either learn how to remove it with photoshop, or use lightrooms ai touch up tool to remove it. While it would have been a good opportunity to learn, I took the easy route out (which in the end taught me nothing). But using the tool made me think, “you know, in the grand scheme of things, this tool is not as bad as generative ai, because it’s not doing all of the creative work, and the rest of the work on the photo is my own work though.” Am I alone on that idea or does anyone else agree with that statement? I think what I’m getting at is, is using a tool like touch up which deploys ai, something that other people use for their work, or should I try to avoid using tools like that? please note that I am neither pro ai nor anti ai, if it serves me ill use it, if it doesn’t serve me I’ll destroy it, but this post is in regards to if the use of this tool will serve me well and is considered acceptable to use in the future. submitted by /u/Old_Neighborhood1385 [link] [comments]