•1 min read•from Machine Learning
[ICML 2026] Extending the deadline for reviewer final justifications while not extending for Author-AC comments was a huge mistake [D]
Just as the title says, I believe the decision to extend the deadline for reviewers to post their final justifications while not allowing authors to contact their ACs was a big misstep. I have a reviewer who, in their final justification is questioning the reliability of experimental setup and evaluation, as was as the fairness of comparison, issues that were never brought up during the initial review or their response to our rebuttal. It seems as though they were looking for reasons to justify not wanting to move their score from weak accept. It now feels like, despite having otherwise strong reviews that are leaning accept, this review might tank the paper.
[link] [comments]
Want to read more?
Check out the full article on the original site
Tagged with
#natural language processing for spreadsheets
#generative AI for data analysis
#Excel alternatives for data analysis
#rows.com
#big data management in spreadsheets
#big data performance
#ICML
#reviewer
#deadline
#experimental setup
#justifications
#evaluation
#initial review
#weak accept
#authors
#ACs
#fairness
#rebuttal
#strong reviews
#comparison