How to deal with subjects that are... not too photogenic?
Our take
I recently did the photography for an inlaws wedding. Went quite well, but when I get to the editing room I realise there are quite a lot of frankly unflattering photos.
For instance, I feel like I pretty much cannot use any photos of the bride smiling. The groom looks wet & shiny from sweat and tears.
I don't want to badmouth them but really not sure what I can do with toothless smiles.
I was the only photographer, so what I have is all there is.
I just don't know how to deal with this. Do I give them photos I think are bad? There were nasty comments at the wedding about appearances and I don't want to feed into that. I want them to have the best photos I can provide.
Thanks
[link] [comments]
Read on the original site
Open the publisher's page for the full experience
Related Articles
- Maternity/ family photosHow do I tell the photographer I hate the photos? When we got the sneak peak, I asked if I could pick the photos for her to edit & she told me she picks the best photos because she’s the professional. I waited for the album, but honestly I hate them all. I really wanted at least one picture of my family & I’m so disappointed. The background is horrible & she told me it would be a great background. My hair looks bad & my kids aren’t smiling in more than half the photos. I also look so fat and awkward in all the photos. She was a nice photographer and the day of the photoshoot she was so patient with us, so I feel bad saying anything. I’m not sure what to do submitted by /u/Extreme_Border8287 [link] [comments]
- Photographer took unflattering photosJust wondering if anyone else has experienced this. I recently hired a photographer (I’m a photographer myself and I photograph weddings and content shoots). I love this photographers style and how they edit and the photos. The photos themselves objectively are not bad however I do genuinely feel like a portrait photographers job is to capture their subjects looking their best, work out their best angles and to take loads of photos in order to have plenty to choose from and options to replace photos their client isn’t happy with. I felt like my shoot was an after thought, when I first spoke with this photographer I showed him a load of inspiration in terms of angles and poses as I trusted the editing style but I wanted him to capture the energy I was after. He arrived with no shot list and it felt like he kind of winged it, we were on location bouncing around all day and he was asking me questions throughout the whole process and capturing really ugly shots of me talking (I assume in an effort to make me more relaxed? But it makes the shots look terrible) I love a candid but I think a mid conversation candid is a no no for a shoot tbh. He sent me the raws to choose from and there wasn’t that much to choose from so I settled for what I could hoping the edit might make me feel better about them. But to be honest with you, I feel like they’re don’t capture me looking my best at all and even the edit feels rushed and not carefully done and I feel like he just hasn’t done a good job. Does anyone else agree that as a portrait photographer he should at-least direct me a bit and help me find my best angles? That’s what I do almost every shoot I do, and the fact he didn’t arrive with any kind of shot list I just feel like he ignored my brief totally. Is it fair for me to ask for a reshoot in this situation? submitted by /u/Optimal-Rock-988 [link] [comments]
- How can you make the best out of a bad lighting situation?I'm a new photographer and I just got home from an event I was taking pictures at feeling very discouraged and honestly a bit peeved at myself for the photos that I got. This event was in someones living room at night and the lighting was very very dim. I get discouraged from using flash in those kinds of intimate settings because it can be really annoying (or maybe I'm projecting and people actually don't actually care) Anywho, I got into this event for free because I offered to take photos but they all turned out terrible. Waaayyy too much grain, super blurry?? and like I said very very dim. I don't even know if any of them are salvageable at this point. I was trying to prioritize getting a light photo and I guess because the aperture was too low and the iso was too high and the shutter speed was too low it all became a mess but I have no idea. Here's an example of what my camera settings were at the time. Also I'm working with a Cannon ESO R10 with an 18-45. F/6.3 1/30 ISO 12800 Please please let me know what I could have done better to take a better picture! submitted by /u/Top_Today3786 [link] [comments]
- Should I explain to the client why the photos look bad?Hi. So I am a low-tier event photography that does a lot of work for university society events. I am editing through a shoot that was from a performance showcase type event. The thing is that the venue that they held the showcase in (a random church) had really bad lighting which forced me to bump my ISO wayyyyy up and hope I can fix in post. Well now that it has come to editing and I have applied heavy denoise and fixed exposure, everyone's faces looks so incredibly wrong. It is fine for the most part but if anyone zooms in even the slightest bit they will be able to tell something is off. My question is, when I deliver the photos should I immediately acknowledge how weird they look and explain why or am I better just waiting to see if they ask about it? I don't want them to secretly think I am simply a bad photographer/editor without me knowing. Any input is much appreciated submitted by /u/AphantasiasMind [link] [comments]