Photo authenticity in the age of AI
Our take
I’ve been thinking about how photographs are perceived by audiences in the age of AI.
It’s become very easy to dismiss an image as AI-generated, like this one showing asperitas clouds, but confirming that a photo is genuine often requires prior knowledge or context that most viewers don’t have.
Are there any established standards or best practices photographers can use to assure their audience that a digital photograph is authentic?
As a software engineer, I tend to think of solutions such as public key cryptography. However, this is not something most people are familiar with. It could still allow a more technical audience to verify that a photograph, including its EXIF data and possibly a thumbnail render of the raw image from the camera, was signed by the photographer and has not been significantly altered (except color corrected) since capture.
[link] [comments]
Read on the original site
Open the publisher's page for the full experience
Related Articles
- How to distinguish real photos from AI-generated onesAre there websites or advanced courses (MOOCs or e-learning) that explain visual analysis methods to distinguish real photos from those generated by AI or inauthentic? submitted by /u/Classic-Tomatillo-62 [link] [comments]
- The Quiet Revolution of Photographers Choosing Analog Over AIWhen was the last time you stumbled across a photograph and admired it for its narrative and beauty? Perhaps yesterday. Perhaps last week. Or perhaps you simply can't recall. In an age when social media and doom-scrolling are seeping into every corner of our homes, offices, and classrooms, there comes a growing concern about what is real and what is fake. With more sophisticated artifical intelligence models rolling out, it has become increasingly impossible to distinguish between a real place and a person and someone created from one's imagination. And as editing platforms are embracing the use of generative AI, the future of photography feels genuinely uncertain. While nobody has the answers, these three photographers are finding new ways to break the AI mold, thanks to their exceptional practices.
- Anyone else in a crisis with photography?Since a while, with image optimization and AI tools so widely spread, I notice that I don't take photos serious anymore. Whenever I see a 'strong' image somewhere, I'd glance at it and think "Well, artificial anyway" and wouldn't occupy myself with it as I used to. I just can't take any photographic picture serious anymore. Somehow, photography is not functioning anymore for me. It has become arbitrary. Is it because of the sheer amount? Because of digital, or AI? Anyone else experiences the same? What is your mileage? submitted by /u/thinkingthetwenties [link] [comments]
- Using AI to manipulate and NOT generate an image?I have a photo where the subject stays the same and I changed the background and added a reflection using AI assisted tools. Is this seen as okay since it’s not generating the image? Where is the line drawn? I know that a lot of people discuss the use of AI to denoise/remove objects/etc, and I wondered where this falls in that argument. submitted by /u/No_Understanding5271 [link] [comments]