•1 min read•from Photography
Using AI to manipulate and NOT generate an image?
Our take
The rise of AI in image manipulation raises intriguing questions about creativity and ethics. When using AI tools to alter a photograph—like changing the background or adding reflections—rather than generating an entirely new image, the boundaries of acceptable use can become blurred. This discussion is particularly relevant as many explore the implications of AI in processes like denoising or object removal. Understanding where the line is drawn in these practices invites a deeper examination of authenticity and artistic expression in a digitally-enhanced world.
I have a photo where the subject stays the same and I changed the background and added a reflection using AI assisted tools. Is this seen as okay since it’s not generating the image? Where is the line drawn? I know that a lot of people discuss the use of AI to denoise/remove objects/etc, and I wondered where this falls in that argument.
[link] [comments]
Read on the original site
Open the publisher's page for the full experience
Tagged with
#health and wellness#luxury photography#fashion photography#wellness photography#AI#image manipulation#AI-assisted tools#background change#photo editing#artificial intelligence#reflection#image generation#denoise#remove objects#image authenticity#subject consistency#ethical considerations#digital photography#visual alterations#creative process