•1 min read•from Photography
Photos being mislabeled as AI?
Our take
Have you ever faced the frustration of having your authentic photographs mislabeled as AI-generated on Reddit? It seems that the platform's algorithms struggle to distinguish between edited images and those captured in reality. I've encountered this issue twice in different photography subreddits. The first time, after reaching out to moderators, they acknowledged their mistake and restored my photo. However, after the second incident, I decided to stop posting in that sub altogether.
Anyone else have multiple issues with Reddit pulling down your photos because they are AI? But they’re not AI. They’re 100% real, but the AI algorithms of Reddit apparently can’t tell the differences between editing and AI. It’s happened twice to me on here but in a different photography sub. The first time it happened, I reached out to the moderators and they finally got back to me a day later and said they made a mistake and they restored the photo. Then it happened again and I just let it go. But I also stopped posting on that sub.
[link] [comments]
Read on the original site
Open the publisher's page for the full experience
Related Articles
- Do you regularly include a disclaimer that your photos are not AI?I just shared a portrait that was 100% just solid photography and lighting and the first question was “was it AI?”. It’s really sad. Yes you can make a low effort ai slop portrait out of a cell phone pic, but I’m not in the business of doing that. Do you regularly mention these days that your photos are not gen AI when you share them? submitted by /u/atlanta-snaps [link] [comments]
- Photo authenticity in the age of AII’ve been thinking about how photographs are perceived by audiences in the age of AI. It’s become very easy to dismiss an image as AI-generated, like this one showing asperitas clouds, but confirming that a photo is genuine often requires prior knowledge or context that most viewers don’t have. Are there any established standards or best practices photographers can use to assure their audience that a digital photograph is authentic? As a software engineer, I tend to think of solutions such as public key cryptography. However, this is not something most people are familiar with. It could still allow a more technical audience to verify that a photograph, including its EXIF data and possibly a thumbnail render of the raw image from the camera, was signed by the photographer and has not been significantly altered (except color corrected) since capture. submitted by /u/v3gard [link] [comments]
Tagged with
#health and wellness#luxury photography#fashion photography#wellness photography#AI#photos#mislabeled#photography#Reddit#algorithms#real#editing#restored#moderators#issues#subreddit#differences#community#mistake#content removal